Support for animal cruelty potentially just got a whole lot worse with the changes to Senate voting arrangements

The Turnbull lead Coalition Government has an appalling record in its support for animal cruelty. In just a few months it has added further support to the live trade in farm animals, the grotesque kangaroo slaughter industry, and the overseas trade in greyhound dogs to name just three areas.

The changes to the voting system recently imposed upon us by the Liberal and Green alliance means this record on animal cruelty by the Australian Parliament may get a whole lot worse. Both of these parties believe it will increase their chances of having their own senators elected while smaller parties will be disadvantaged. The major parties already have a disproportionately greater number of Senate seats compared to their share of the overall vote, while smaller parties share of Senate seats is currently lower than their 20 percent share of the Senate vote.

The new changes mean voters have to number a minimum of six party-named boxes above the line. Alternatively, one can number at least 12 candidate-named boxes below the line. As so much confusion is expected in relation to the new system on Election Day, just one party box numbered above the line will be accepted to prevent a very high rate of informal vote.

Voting [1] for the AJP above the line will give animals a better chance in the decisions of the Australian Parliament then they have ever had before. The AJP:

  • is the only political party that has preventing animal cruelty as its central objective
  • is much larger than many of the other parties often referred to as micro parties
  • will gain enough votes to ensure major Parties will want to conclude preference deals with us to try and help their candidate gain the last Senate seat in the State. In exchange for this we will demand concessions for the animals
  • stands in lower as well upper house seats and there is no change in that voting system. By strategically targeting marginal lower house seats we will again be pressuring the major Parties to negotiate with us for the animals
  • will only highly preference other parties where we are convinced they support animal wellbeing in their policies and practices
  • was able to win a seat in NSW under a similar voting system, however it will be harder to do this federally as the percentage of votes required for a federal seat is greater than it is in NSW
  • has excellent Senate candidates and resources (esp. brilliant volunteers) to fight this election and are still in with a chance of winning seats.

Comments are closed